AramaKütüphanem
Daha fazla ▼
Kitap raflarıKodu kullan
bookmate game
7 gün boyunca ücretsiz
tr
en
Uygulamalarımızda okuyun:
iOS
·
Android
Hannah Fry

Hello World

Kitap eklendiğinde bana bildir
İzlenim
Kitaplığıma ekle
Zaten okundu
Kitaptaki bir hatayı bildirin
Bu kitabı okumak için Bookmate’e EPUB ya da FB2 dosyası yükleyin. Bir kitabı nasıl yüklerim?
Google’da ara
A look inside the algorithms that are shaping our lives and the dilemmas they bring with them.
If you were accused of a crime, who would you rather decide your sentence—a mathematically consistent algorithm incapable of empathy or a compassionate human judge prone to bias and error? What if you want to buy a driverless car and must choose between one programmed to save as many lives as possible and another that prioritizes the lives of its own passengers? And would you agree to share your family's full medical history if you were told that it would help researchers find a cure for cancer?
These are just some of the dilemmas that we are beginning to face as we approach the age of the algorithm, when it feels as if the machines reign supreme. Already, these lines of code are telling us what to watch, where to go, whom to date, and even whom to send to jail. But as we rely on algorithms to automate big, important decisions—in crime, justice, healthcare,…
Bu kitap şu anda mevcut değil
311 yazdırılmış sayfalar

İlgili kitaplarTümü

Bunu zaten okudunuz mu? Bunun hakkında ne düşünüyorsunuz?
👍👎

Alıntılar

  • kinokitoalıntı yaptı3 yıl önce
    Others still, Immanuel Kant among them, have said the truth is something in between. That our judgements of beauty are not wholly subjective, nor can they be entirely objective. They are sensory, emotional and intellectual all at once – and, crucially, can change over time depending on the state of mind of the observer
      • Beğen
      • Yorum
      • Bunu bildirin
    • kinokitoalıntı yaptı3 yıl önce
      But then the researchers realized something remarkable. If they started pooling answers – combining votes from the individual testers to give an overall assessment on an image – the accuracy rate shot up to 99 per cent.

      What was truly extraordinary about this study was not the skill of the testers. It was their identity. These plucky lifesavers were not oncologists. They were not pathologists. They were not nurses. They were not even medical students. They were ­pigeons.

      Pathologists’ jobs are safe for a while yet – I don’t think even the scientists who designed the study were suggesting that doctors should be replaced by plain old pigeons. But the experiment did demonstrate an important point: spotting patterns hiding among clusters of cells is not a uniquely human skill. So, if a pigeon can manage it, why not an algorithm?

      I am impressed..

        • Beğen
        • Yorum
        • Bunu bildirin
      • kinokitoalıntı yaptı3 yıl önce
        Perhaps more ominous, given how much of our information we now get from algorithms like search engines, is how much agency people believed they had in their own opinions: ‘When people are unaware they are being manipulated, they tend to believe they have adopted their new thinking voluntarily,’ Epstein wrote in the original paper.
          • Beğen
          • Yorum
          • Bunu bildirin

        Kitap raflarında

        Sadece tek bir kitap hediye etmeyin, bir kütüphane hediye edin.Bir Bookmate aboneliği verin →
        fb2epub
        Dosyalarınızı sürükleyin ve bırakın (bir kerede en fazla 5 tane)